<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Death of the print newspaper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonners.org/b/982/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonners.org/b/982</link>
	<description>A journey through marriage, publishing, motorracing and gaming... The adventures of Lofty and Stumpy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:21:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trefor</title>
		<link>http://jonners.org/b/982/comment-page-1#comment-2267</link>
		<dc:creator>Trefor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonners.org/?p=982#comment-2267</guid>
		<description>Print is DEAD............man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Print is DEAD&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://jonners.org/b/982/comment-page-1#comment-2197</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 16:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonners.org/?p=982#comment-2197</guid>
		<description>I have to say, I am less convinced. I think you are failing to take into account brand loyalty. Most people buy the paper they do, not because it costs 20p less than another, but more for what it has to say and the perceived accuracy of its reporting. Personally, I never understood the appeal of newspapers in these more connected times. I get my news from maybe 35 to 40 sources a day. OK, so maybe I read a lot more sources than need be, but it you want accurate news that is the way forward. As for the likes of the Times and alike going under, go count the adverts on the Timeonline&#039;s pages...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, I am less convinced. I think you are failing to take into account brand loyalty. Most people buy the paper they do, not because it costs 20p less than another, but more for what it has to say and the perceived accuracy of its reporting. Personally, I never understood the appeal of newspapers in these more connected times. I get my news from maybe 35 to 40 sources a day. OK, so maybe I read a lot more sources than need be, but it you want accurate news that is the way forward. As for the likes of the Times and alike going under, go count the adverts on the Timeonline&#8217;s pages&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

