<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonners.org/b/707/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonners.org/b/707</link>
	<description>A journey through marriage, publishing, motorracing and gaming... The adventures of Lofty and Stumpy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:21:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonners99</title>
		<link>http://jonners.org/b/707/comment-page-1#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>jonners99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonners.org/2007/08/27/707/#comment-829</guid>
		<description>I apologise Grotesque is not the word I was aiming for... I was aiming for nearer to unusual. No offence intended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apologise Grotesque is not the word I was aiming for&#8230; I was aiming for nearer to unusual. No offence intended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trefor</title>
		<link>http://jonners.org/b/707/comment-page-1#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Trefor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonners.org/2007/08/27/707/#comment-825</guid>
		<description>Oh dear now you&#039;ve done it. Do you know what grotesque actually means and was it the word you meant to use &quot;comically or repulsively distorted, absurd? 

I suppose with that definition it could be grotesque if you sang nothing but Spice Girls songs instead of hymns and the service was led by an elk! However, not even my Junior Church Anniversaries are that absurd (although the elk idea is a good one and I might use it next year if I could find a theological or doctrinal link).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear now you&#8217;ve done it. Do you know what grotesque actually means and was it the word you meant to use &#8220;comically or repulsively distorted, absurd? </p>
<p>I suppose with that definition it could be grotesque if you sang nothing but Spice Girls songs instead of hymns and the service was led by an elk! However, not even my Junior Church Anniversaries are that absurd (although the elk idea is a good one and I might use it next year if I could find a theological or doctrinal link).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fran</title>
		<link>http://jonners.org/b/707/comment-page-1#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Fran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 20:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonners.org/2007/08/27/707/#comment-824</guid>
		<description>Really, there are quite a numbe of ways of expressing worhsip, my goodness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, there are quite a numbe of ways of expressing worhsip, my goodness!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://jonners.org/b/707/comment-page-1#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonners.org/2007/08/27/707/#comment-823</guid>
		<description>&quot;grotesque&quot;... now there is an interesting word for describing Sunday morning worship...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;grotesque&#8221;&#8230; now there is an interesting word for describing Sunday morning worship&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

